<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBB Top Position Players for 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/</link>
	<description>The Ultimate Source for College Baseball News and Notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:12:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NewYorkDore</title>
		<link>http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>NewYorkDore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I think the person we left out who would garner the most interest would have to be Kyle Russell.  But I&#039;d stand by the exclusion as Russell seems to be the most &quot;pitchable&quot; of the bunch.  That said, I lobbied for DLO to be included, though he is probably the most slump-prone of the above listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the person we left out who would garner the most interest would have to be Kyle Russell.  But I&#8217;d stand by the exclusion as Russell seems to be the most &#8220;pitchable&#8221; of the bunch.  That said, I lobbied for DLO to be included, though he is probably the most slump-prone of the above listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
