<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBB Top Position Players for 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/</link>
	<description>The Ultimate Source for College Baseball News and Notes</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: NewYorkDore</title>
		<link>http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>NewYorkDore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecollegebaseballblog.com/2007/11/06/cbb-top-position-players-for-2008/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I think the person we left out who would garner the most interest would have to be Kyle Russell.  But I'd stand by the exclusion as Russell seems to be the most "pitchable" of the bunch.  That said, I lobbied for DLO to be included, though he is probably the most slump-prone of the above listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the person we left out who would garner the most interest would have to be Kyle Russell.  But I&#8217;d stand by the exclusion as Russell seems to be the most &#8220;pitchable&#8221; of the bunch.  That said, I lobbied for DLO to be included, though he is probably the most slump-prone of the above listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.409 seconds -->
